I'm sorry guys... The codes for the previous Tournament no longer work... I have no Idea why either D: .
I contacted Chaotic Support And I haven't gotten an answer back yet, so for now I am assuming that they won't work period, so the contestestants will receive one Mipedian Rare (just PM me guys) And If the codes do turn out to work, I will Give them to you guys!
Once again I am Sooooo Sorry..
Saturday, November 28, 2009
Thursday, November 26, 2009
We owe Mattwo
He Got us Episode 2 and 3 !!
http://www.megavideo.com/?d=P9RV82IU
http://www.megavideo.com/?d=JWHDMLKE
http://www.megavideo.com/?d=P9RV82IU
http://www.megavideo.com/?d=JWHDMLKE
Another contest?
HEY! If you were in the competition earlier and have not read the previous post please do so!
So as you have noticed it has been REALLY quiet lately around here ._. I'd Like to change that ^_^. How? By having ANOTHER competition, but the prize is MUCH bigger this time! How Much bigger? WAY bigger. Here is the prize... *drum roll* ... You get to become an author on this very blog :O! I kid you not this is the prize, the winner will become a co-author with myself, they will get to see many of my deck creations, before they go public! They will be able to post here themselves, have their own competitions! The List goes on! For this competition though we have to have a way to compete!
So here is how you do so!
Send me an Article as if you were posting on a blog. So for example Make a deck and Explain it thoroughly. Now you don't Have to make a deck, you can do whatever you want.
Here is an example when CInsider did something like this. You guys can use these as an example. (Link)
So I will base my winners off of three things. Good Grammar and Spelling. Originality and a Good Command over the english language.
Good luck!
BTW I may pick more than one winner ;)
So as you have noticed it has been REALLY quiet lately around here ._. I'd Like to change that ^_^. How? By having ANOTHER competition, but the prize is MUCH bigger this time! How Much bigger? WAY bigger. Here is the prize... *drum roll* ... You get to become an author on this very blog :O! I kid you not this is the prize, the winner will become a co-author with myself, they will get to see many of my deck creations, before they go public! They will be able to post here themselves, have their own competitions! The List goes on! For this competition though we have to have a way to compete!
So here is how you do so!
Send me an Article as if you were posting on a blog. So for example Make a deck and Explain it thoroughly. Now you don't Have to make a deck, you can do whatever you want.
Here is an example when CInsider did something like this. You guys can use these as an example. (Link)
So I will base my winners off of three things. Good Grammar and Spelling. Originality and a Good Command over the english language.
Good luck!
BTW I may pick more than one winner ;)
The (late) Winner!
So with Final Scores as Such!...
1st- TwisterX241 - Winner of Blazvatan!
2nd- Gamemaster76 - Winner of a Warbeast Power Leash!
3rd- Wagnerl - Winner of a Slashclaw!
4th- Guilieon - Winner of a Slashclaw!
PM me on Chaotic for your prize!
Here are my final revised notes on the decks.
Wagnerl
Originality: 4.5/10
Effectiveness:7/10
Mechanics:7.5/10
Consistency:6/10
-Lost Originality points for a Fairly Typical Earth/Air Deck
-Got Originaltiy points for Using Kolmo + Citadel Lodestone'
-Lost Some Effectiveness points for not fully maxxing out Taffial's Ability, by using more attack cards twice
-Looks Like it could hold its ground in a match
-Lost Mechanics points for Lots of High BP attacks and Lots of Low BP attacks, this can work against you
-Lost Consistency points for in consistant Attacks and Locations
-Gained Consistecny points for the Attacks and Location Meshing together alright
TOTAL 25/40
===================================================
Twisterx241
Originality: 7/10
Effectiveness:8/10
Mechanics:7/10 NOW A 7
Consistency:6/10
-Lost Originality Because of of a typical Strike Deck
-Gained Originality, by placing your own spin on it
-Has a good Effectivness mark, because it could hold up really well in a fight
- *POINTED OUT THAT SIRRICO FLIPS THE MUGICIANS LYRE GIVING THE FINAL NEEDED COUNTER* Lost Mechanic points for Lack of mugic counters, you cant play All of your mugic, which can be a massive disadvantage
-Attacks and Locations mesh nicely
-Attack cards look semi-spontainious
TOTAL 28/40 NOW A 28
===================================================
Gamemaster76
Originality: 7/10
Effectiveness:6/10
Mechanics:6.5/10 NOW A 7.5
Consistency:5.5/10
-Lost originality points for Using the 2 Owayki/Prince Mundeenu COTG combo
-Gained Originality for using Ruhban, Maliph and Rasbma with the above combo
-Good effetivness mark because I know this would be good in a battle.
*POINT GAINED BACK FOR WELL PLACED ARGUEMENT*-Lost some Mechanics points for Sword of Khy'at, There are some better choices like the Levitaar, But the sword still works fine.
-Mugic is good a nice balance of Healing and Dealing mugic
-Lost consistency points for not doubling up in attacks and locations, this is Ok however since it adds much more variety
-Attacks and Loactions mesh togeth OK.
TOTAL 25/40 NOW A 26
===================================================
Guilieon
Originality 8/10
Effectiveness 5/10
Mechanics 5/10
Consistancy 6.5/10
-Gained Originality for using the lesser Mipedian Strikers
-Decent effectiveness mark, It could do O.K. in a match
-Lost mechanic points for some poorer Battlegear choices
-lost mechanics points for some attack cards that probably shouldn't be there
-Attacks a Location mesh alright.
TOTAL 24.5/40
1st- TwisterX241 - Winner of Blazvatan!
2nd- Gamemaster76 - Winner of a Warbeast Power Leash!
3rd- Wagnerl - Winner of a Slashclaw!
4th- Guilieon - Winner of a Slashclaw!
PM me on Chaotic for your prize!
Here are my final revised notes on the decks.
Wagnerl
Originality: 4.5/10
Effectiveness:7/10
Mechanics:7.5/10
Consistency:6/10
-Lost Originality points for a Fairly Typical Earth/Air Deck
-Got Originaltiy points for Using Kolmo + Citadel Lodestone'
-Lost Some Effectiveness points for not fully maxxing out Taffial's Ability, by using more attack cards twice
-Looks Like it could hold its ground in a match
-Lost Mechanics points for Lots of High BP attacks and Lots of Low BP attacks, this can work against you
-Lost Consistency points for in consistant Attacks and Locations
-Gained Consistecny points for the Attacks and Location Meshing together alright
TOTAL 25/40
===================================================
Twisterx241
Originality: 7/10
Effectiveness:8/10
Mechanics:7/10 NOW A 7
Consistency:6/10
-Lost Originality Because of of a typical Strike Deck
-Gained Originality, by placing your own spin on it
-Has a good Effectivness mark, because it could hold up really well in a fight
- *POINTED OUT THAT SIRRICO FLIPS THE MUGICIANS LYRE GIVING THE FINAL NEEDED COUNTER* Lost Mechanic points for Lack of mugic counters, you cant play All of your mugic, which can be a massive disadvantage
-Attacks and Locations mesh nicely
-Attack cards look semi-spontainious
TOTAL 28/40 NOW A 28
===================================================
Gamemaster76
Originality: 7/10
Effectiveness:6/10
Mechanics:6.5/10 NOW A 7.5
Consistency:5.5/10
-Lost originality points for Using the 2 Owayki/Prince Mundeenu COTG combo
-Gained Originality for using Ruhban, Maliph and Rasbma with the above combo
-Good effetivness mark because I know this would be good in a battle.
*POINT GAINED BACK FOR WELL PLACED ARGUEMENT*-Lost some Mechanics points for Sword of Khy'at, There are some better choices like the Levitaar, But the sword still works fine.
-Mugic is good a nice balance of Healing and Dealing mugic
-Lost consistency points for not doubling up in attacks and locations, this is Ok however since it adds much more variety
-Attacks and Loactions mesh togeth OK.
TOTAL 25/40 NOW A 26
===================================================
Guilieon
Originality 8/10
Effectiveness 5/10
Mechanics 5/10
Consistancy 6.5/10
-Gained Originality for using the lesser Mipedian Strikers
-Decent effectiveness mark, It could do O.K. in a match
-Lost mechanic points for some poorer Battlegear choices
-lost mechanics points for some attack cards that probably shouldn't be there
-Attacks a Location mesh alright.
TOTAL 24.5/40
Monday, November 23, 2009
Sorry Guys
I need to let you guys know that I may not be able to get the news episodes anymore. I will keep trying however and as soon as I get them, you guys will be the first to know!
Friday, November 20, 2009
The plea
Alright so time is up!
There were four submissions into the contest, Here are my foot notes for each deck
Wagnerl
Originality: 4.5/10
Effectiveness:7/10
Mechanics:7.5/10
Consistency:6/10
-Lost Originality points for a Fairly Typical Earth/Air Deck
-Got Originaltiy points for Using Kolmo + Citadel Lodestone'
-Lost Some Effectiveness points for not fully maxxing out Taffial's Ability, by using more attack cards twice
-Looks Like it could hold its ground in a match
-Lost Mechanics points for Lots of High BP attacks and Lots of Low BP attacks, this can work against you
-Lost Consistency points for in consistant Attacks and Locations
-Gained Consistecny points for the Attacks and Location Meshing together alright
TOTAL 25/40
===================================================
Twisterx241
Originality: 7/10
Effectiveness:8/10
Mechanics:6/10
Consistency:6/10
-Lost Originality Because of of a typical Strike Deck
-Gained Originality, by placing your own spin on it
-Has a good Effectivness mark, because it could hold up really well in a fight
-Lost Mechanic points for Lack of mugic counters, you cant play All of your mugic, which can be a massive disadvantage
-Attacks and Locations mesh nicely
-Attack cards look semi-spontainious
TOTAL 27/40
===================================================
Gamemaster76
Originality: 7/10
Effectiveness:6/10
Mechanics:6.5/10
Consistency:5.5/10
-Lost originality points for Using the 2 Owayki/Prince Mundeenu COTG combo
-Gained Originality for using Ruhban, Maliph and Rasbma with the above combo
-Good effetivness mark because I know this would be good in a battle.
-Lost some Mechanics points for Sword of Khy'at, There are some better choices like the Levitaar, But the sword still works fine.
-Mugic is good a nice balance of Healing and Dealing mugic
-Lost consistency points for not doubling up in attacks and locations, this is Ok however since it adds much more variety
-Attacks and Loactions mesh togeth OK.
TOTAL 25/40
===================================================
Guilieon
Originality 8/10
Effectiveness 5/10
Mechanics 5/10
Consistancy 6.5/10
-Gained Originality for using the lesser Mipedian Strikers
-Decent effectiveness mark, It could do O.K. in a match
-Lost mechanic points for some poorer Battlegear choices
-lost mechanics points for some attack cards that probably shouldn't be there
-Attacks a Location mesh alright.
TOTAL 24.5/40
So Twister WON!
But it is not over yet... Oh nay nay. The contestants have one shot to attempt to make me improve their score. How? With the points stated above, you must try to convince me that those negative points shouldn't be there. (ie. I stated against Twister "-Lost Mechanic points for Lack of mugic counters, you cant play All of your mugic, which can be a massive disadvantage" Maybe my math was wrong.) Try to convince me to improve your score!
HOWEVER! If you point something out and it turns out that it uncovered something about your deck that would make you lose points, it will. So be careful.
You guys have until Sunday at Midnight (I'll take into consideration your time-zone)
Kerb.
There were four submissions into the contest, Here are my foot notes for each deck
Wagnerl
Originality: 4.5/10
Effectiveness:7/10
Mechanics:7.5/10
Consistency:6/10
-Lost Originality points for a Fairly Typical Earth/Air Deck
-Got Originaltiy points for Using Kolmo + Citadel Lodestone'
-Lost Some Effectiveness points for not fully maxxing out Taffial's Ability, by using more attack cards twice
-Looks Like it could hold its ground in a match
-Lost Mechanics points for Lots of High BP attacks and Lots of Low BP attacks, this can work against you
-Lost Consistency points for in consistant Attacks and Locations
-Gained Consistecny points for the Attacks and Location Meshing together alright
TOTAL 25/40
===================================================
Twisterx241
Originality: 7/10
Effectiveness:8/10
Mechanics:6/10
Consistency:6/10
-Lost Originality Because of of a typical Strike Deck
-Gained Originality, by placing your own spin on it
-Has a good Effectivness mark, because it could hold up really well in a fight
-Lost Mechanic points for Lack of mugic counters, you cant play All of your mugic, which can be a massive disadvantage
-Attacks and Locations mesh nicely
-Attack cards look semi-spontainious
TOTAL 27/40
===================================================
Gamemaster76
Originality: 7/10
Effectiveness:6/10
Mechanics:6.5/10
Consistency:5.5/10
-Lost originality points for Using the 2 Owayki/Prince Mundeenu COTG combo
-Gained Originality for using Ruhban, Maliph and Rasbma with the above combo
-Good effetivness mark because I know this would be good in a battle.
-Lost some Mechanics points for Sword of Khy'at, There are some better choices like the Levitaar, But the sword still works fine.
-Mugic is good a nice balance of Healing and Dealing mugic
-Lost consistency points for not doubling up in attacks and locations, this is Ok however since it adds much more variety
-Attacks and Loactions mesh togeth OK.
TOTAL 25/40
===================================================
Guilieon
Originality 8/10
Effectiveness 5/10
Mechanics 5/10
Consistancy 6.5/10
-Gained Originality for using the lesser Mipedian Strikers
-Decent effectiveness mark, It could do O.K. in a match
-Lost mechanic points for some poorer Battlegear choices
-lost mechanics points for some attack cards that probably shouldn't be there
-Attacks a Location mesh alright.
TOTAL 24.5/40
So Twister WON!
But it is not over yet... Oh nay nay. The contestants have one shot to attempt to make me improve their score. How? With the points stated above, you must try to convince me that those negative points shouldn't be there. (ie. I stated against Twister "-Lost Mechanic points for Lack of mugic counters, you cant play All of your mugic, which can be a massive disadvantage" Maybe my math was wrong.) Try to convince me to improve your score!
HOWEVER! If you point something out and it turns out that it uncovered something about your deck that would make you lose points, it will. So be careful.
You guys have until Sunday at Midnight (I'll take into consideration your time-zone)
Kerb.
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Initiation
So MandibleMuge is having a contest on The Danian Hall to try and influnce some new Danian Players, Eh? Well as a Mipedian Player I can't let that happen, Sooo I am Having a Contest Too! Pretty much the Same rules except all about the Mipedians, So I want you to submit (To Kerberos (Dats me :P) on Chaotic) a Deck focused on Mipedians! Classic Strikers , Warbeasts, even Mixed decks (But they have to focus around Mipedians)
The Prize? I'll give you three guesses... Look down. :D
So since I am Basing this of off MandibleMuge's contest I will rate the deck similar to his
"Originality: (You can use the same old Nimmei build, but if you put an original spin on it, you will get more points)
Effectiveness: (Using random cards is original.. will it win a match?)
Mechanics: (Does it really work? Be sure to brush up on your rulings before you submit a deck!)
Consistency: (Does everything work together? Do your attacks, elements, locations and creatures mesh together? Do you have control-tendencies in an aggro deck that dont fit?)
Rules!
1 - These decks can be hypothetical. You do not have to actually have the cards. However, keep it practical. If there is an ultra in somewhere where a common could be used, you could lose marks.
2 - Please do not copy decks. This is almost impossible to police, but to reinforce this, do not show anyone else your deck! If you do not show anyone else your deck, and it's original, then no one can have copied you.
3 - Tournament ends 20th November.
4- I WILL not Accept decks from people who have not read the rules, So to confirm this in you message any put, Obey Iflar!
5 - PM all submissions to me in 6v6 Master rules format on Chaotic. Screen-name is Kerberos
6 - The decks can be mixed decks, so long as it includes at least one Mipedian creature, and it must center around using the Mipedian. For example,Using a Grantkae deck with two neekwins is fine , using a Gorram deck with two Fasseph is Not.
7 - Do your best and have fun!"
(quoted From The DanianHall, minus a couple of Changes)
Have A blast!
PS- Prizes (besides Blazvatan) Will Be announced at a Later Date!
The Prize? I'll give you three guesses... Look down. :D
So since I am Basing this of off MandibleMuge's contest I will rate the deck similar to his"Originality: (You can use the same old Nimmei build, but if you put an original spin on it, you will get more points)
Effectiveness: (Using random cards is original.. will it win a match?)
Mechanics: (Does it really work? Be sure to brush up on your rulings before you submit a deck!)
Consistency: (Does everything work together? Do your attacks, elements, locations and creatures mesh together? Do you have control-tendencies in an aggro deck that dont fit?)
Rules!
1 - These decks can be hypothetical. You do not have to actually have the cards. However, keep it practical. If there is an ultra in somewhere where a common could be used, you could lose marks.
2 - Please do not copy decks. This is almost impossible to police, but to reinforce this, do not show anyone else your deck! If you do not show anyone else your deck, and it's original, then no one can have copied you.
3 - Tournament ends 20th November.
4- I WILL not Accept decks from people who have not read the rules, So to confirm this in you message any put, Obey Iflar!
5 - PM all submissions to me in 6v6 Master rules format on Chaotic. Screen-name is Kerberos
6 - The decks can be mixed decks, so long as it includes at least one Mipedian creature, and it must center around using the Mipedian. For example,Using a Grantkae deck with two neekwins is fine , using a Gorram deck with two Fasseph is Not.
7 - Do your best and have fun!"
(quoted From The DanianHall, minus a couple of Changes)
Have A blast!
PS- Prizes (besides Blazvatan) Will Be announced at a Later Date!
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Season 3 Episode 1
TAH DAH! So after a long term of Silence!
The Embedding isn't working right again, so here is a link
http://www.megavideo.com/?v=9NH71F6U
The Embedding isn't working right again, so here is a link
http://www.megavideo.com/?v=9NH71F6U
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)